Interesting plot, some funny moments, good entertainment.

Interesting Premise, But Nothing Special Movie-Wise

Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "Showbiz people are so phony"

Greystone Park & Mansion - 905 Loma Vista Drive, Beverly Hills, California, USA

Kim Basinger, Al Pacino, and Téa Leoni in People I Know (2002)

John Cusack, Al Pacino, and Bridget Fonda in City Hall (1996)

Al Pacino and Jerry Orbach in Chinese Coffee (2000)

Al Pacino and Paul Guilfoyle in The Local Stigmatic (1990)

Al Pacino and Greta Gerwig in The Humbling (2014)

Al Pacino and Jessica Chastain in Salomé (2013)

Al Pacino and Helen Mirren in Phil Spector (2013)

Al Pacino, Jeremy Irons, Joseph Fiennes, and Lynn Collins in The Merchant of Venice (2004)

Roberto Birindelli, Natalia Mikeliunas, and Simone Telecchi in Simone (2013)

Al Pacino and Colin Farrell in The Recruit (2003)

Al Pacino and Rachel Roberts in S1m0ne (2002)

You're more authentic than all the people who worship you, and that's the problem you're lookin' at... the real fraud. I told myself this was all about the work. But if that were the truth, it wouldn't matter to me that you got all the attention, and it does; it does. I'm sorry, Simone. Here I was trying to convince the whole world you existed, but what I was really trying to do was convince them that I exist.

Jason Schwartzman and Pruitt Taylor Vince in S1m0ne (2002)

Al Pacino and Catherine Keener in S1m0ne (2002)

Al Pacino and Winona Ryder in S1m0ne (2002)

Al Pacino

Catherine Keener

Rachel Roberts

Andrew Niccol

A producer&apos;s film is endangered when his star walks off, so he decides to digitally create an actress to substitute for the star, becoming an overnight sensation that everyone thinks is a real person.

S1m0ne

Uneven, but definitely worth watching

Ever since I first saw Gattaca, I&apos;ve been looking for other films directed by Andrew Niccol. This being one of them, and so far, one of the only ones(but I certainly hope he makes more films in the future... he has some very interesting ideas), I simply had to watch. I was not disappointed. Like Gattaca, this is science fiction; however, Gattaca is more of a all-out sci-fi film, and S1m0ne only has some elements of science fiction. Before I comment on the sci-fi, I must comment on the great humor in the film. This is the first of Niccol&apos;s films(Truman Show, Gattaca and then this) I&apos;ve seen that has comedy(in the form of satire, that is). Truly great comedy, as well. You know why? Because it&apos;s real. It&apos;s stuff that we can recognize, stuff that we know from ourselves, from the people around us. The comedy mostly revolves around how easily everyone is tricked, how quick they are to believe in something without any proof. I believe it was Voltaire who said: &quot;If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent one&quot;. We want to be deceived, we want to be tricked, we want to have something to hope for and believe in. I mean, let&apos;s be honest; that is the very basis for why religion exists, and why people claim to spot UFOs. People need to believe in something... and they believe in Simone. Despite what her maker has her do, despite no one ever having met her in person, people love her. They need to. They need someone, something to believe in. The many scenes of Viktor covering up Simone not being real, creating the illusion of her in various forms to satisfy other people&apos;s urge to see her, meet her, talk to her may be somewhat slapstick in their nature, but they only emphasize how ludicrous and easily bought the everyday man is. They want to believe it so badly, they simply can&apos;t accept anything else. This seems to be what most critics of this film are missing. Their refusal to accept it is simply them denying human nature. As Pacino&apos;s character realizes near the end: &quot;She&apos;s indestructible&quot;. It is not possible to remove her, because the public won&apos;t accept it. She must exist. I noticed a lot of references to the story of Frankenstein in this film. It is basically the 21st century&apos;s version of Frankenstein, with some computer-based science fiction elements and set in Hollywood. I have never seen a film that so openly mocks the superficiality of Hollywood, and for that reason alone, anyone should see it. The plot is very good, though it develops at a somewhat uneven pace... in fact, the pacing seems a tad off. The acting is mostly very good. The special effects are top-notch... they were in 2002, and they still are. This could have been better, but it was still very good. I recommend this to anyone who is interested from reading the plot outline, people who enjoyed Gattaca and fans of science fiction as commentary on real issues. 7/10

Simone

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYzEzZWU3Y2YtOWE1NC00NWFjLTkwYmYtMDY3OWUwNGQ5NTUyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzU1NzE3NTg@._V1_.jpg

Ever since I first saw Gattaca, I've been looking for other films directed by Andrew Niccol. This being one of them, and so far, one of the only ones(but I certainly hope he makes more films in the future... he has some very interesting ideas), I simply had to watch. I was not disappointed. Like Gattaca, this is science fiction; however, Gattaca is more of a all-out sci-fi film, and S1m0ne only has some elements of science fiction. Before I comment on the sci-fi, I must comment on the great humor in the film. This is the first of Niccol's films(Truman Show, Gattaca and then this) I've seen that has comedy(in the form of satire, that is). Truly great comedy, as well. You know why? Because it's real. It's stuff that we can recognize, stuff that we know from ourselves, from the people around us. The comedy mostly revolves around how easily everyone is tricked, how quick they are to believe in something without any proof. I believe it was Voltaire who said: "If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent one". We want to be deceived, we want to be tricked, we want to have something to hope for and believe in. I mean, let's be honest; that is the very basis for why religion exists, and why people claim to spot UFOs. People need to believe in something... and they believe in Simone. Despite what her maker has her do, despite no one ever having met her in person, people love her. They need to. They need someone, something to believe in. The many scenes of Viktor covering up Simone not being real, creating the illusion of her in various forms to satisfy other people's urge to see her, meet her, talk to her may be somewhat slapstick in their nature, but they only emphasize how ludicrous and easily bought the everyday man is. They want to believe it so badly, they simply can't accept anything else. This seems to be what most critics of this film are missing. Their refusal to accept it is simply them denying human nature. As Pacino's character realizes near the end: "She's indestructible". It is not possible to remove her, because the public won't accept it. She must exist. I noticed a lot of references to the story of Frankenstein in this film. It is basically the 21st century's version of Frankenstein, with some computer-based science fiction elements and set in Hollywood. I have never seen a film that so openly mocks the superficiality of Hollywood, and for that reason alone, anyone should see it. The plot is very good, though it develops at a somewhat uneven pace... in fact, the pacing seems a tad off. The acting is mostly very good. The special effects are top-notch... they were in 2002, and they still are. This could have been better, but it was still very good. I recommend this to anyone who is interested from reading the plot outline, people who enjoyed Gattaca and fans of science fiction as commentary on real issues. 7/10

A producer's film is endangered when his star walks off, so he decides to digitally create an actress to substitute for the star, becoming an overnight sensation that everyone thinks is a real person.

bappamtv

S1m0ne

🎭 Top Cast

💰 Box Office

🎬 Technical Specs

🏷️ Keywords

🎯 Categories

⭐ Featured Review

💡 Did You Know?

🎬 More Like This

📖 Synopsis