Wes Craven Presents Dracula II: Ascension

Is 'Dracula II: Ascension' based on a book?

How long after 'Dracula 2000' ends does 'Ascension' begin?

Not a bad direct to video film but has little to do with Wes Craven's Dracula 2000

Just a Reasonable Movie of Vampire, Not a Sequel of Dracula 2000

An unusual twist on the 'Dracula' mythos, but needed some work

Rutger Hauer, Jason Scott Lee, Roy Scheider, and Diane Neal in Dracula III: Legacy (2005)

Johnathon Schaech, Izabella Miko, Kerr Smith, Brendan Fehr, and Phina Oruche in The Forsaken (2001)

From Dusk Till Dawn 3: The Hangman's Daughter

Rebecca Gayheart, Danny Trejo, Marco Leonardi, Temuera Morrison, and Michael Parks in From Dusk Till Dawn 3: The Hangman's Daughter (1999)

From Dusk Till Dawn 2: Texas Blood Money (1999)

Christopher Walken in The Prophecy II (1998)

Angela Bassett and Eddie Murphy in Vampire in Brooklyn (1995)

Who am I? Gilles de Rais, Vlad Tepes, El Hazarid... Dagobert, Proximus, Uther, Caligula... ah, Iscariot... and so many more I've long forgotten.

Stephen Billington and Diane Neal in Dracula II: Ascension (2003)

Jennifer Kroll in Dracula II: Ascension (2003)

Jason Scott Lee, Craig Sheffer, and Jason London in Dracula II: Ascension (2003)

Jennifer Kroll

Jason Scott Lee

Craig Sheffer

Joel Soisson

Patrick Lussier

In this haunting sequel to Wes Craven&apos;s Dracula 2000, a group of medical students discover the body of the infamous count.

Dracula II: Ascension

An unusual twist on the &apos;Dracula&apos; mythos, but needed some work

This is a sequel of sorts to &quot;Dracula 2000&quot;, and the opening moments will be somewhat confusing to those who haven&apos;t seen that movie first. D2K had one original idea going for it (Dracula was actually Judas Iscariot, consumed by his own guilt in his betrayal of Jesus, and who hanged himself), and in the end of D2K, Dracula is both hung from a giant cross AND burned by the rising sun, the combination of which is supposed to be enough finally put the King Of Vampires to rest once and for all.

So D2:Ascension opens up with a paramedic team pulling the fried remains of Dracula in from his hanging gibbet. Apparently the heroes of D2K couldn&apos;t be bothered to actually either a) finally dispose of his body or b) explain to the authorities that the &apos;corpse&apos; might still be dangerous, which strikes me as REMARKABLY irresponsible of them. But anyway, the cleanup crew who pulls in the body only sees Dracula&apos;s remains as those of another anonymous John Doe, and ship the remains off to the nearest morgue. By an INCREDIBLE coincidence, the young lady in charge happens to be part of a group of medical students (and a professor) who are on the lookout for vampire remains. She becomes suspicious that these remains might be those of an actual vampire, and the group carts the remains off to a lonely mansion to soak Drac&apos;s corpse in a bathtub full of blood (don&apos;t worry, it&apos;s plasma from the hospital). Drac revives, and hijinks and hilarity ensue. 

I give the creators credit for adding a few interesting twists and details to the standard vampire tale. The idea of a group of researchers trying to hold a creature as insanely powerful and dangerous as the King Of Vampires while they try to isolate the factors that grant him power and immortality is potentially quite good. The group dynamics are also interesting, with internal dissension and betrayals tearing the group apart almost from the beginning. And some of the little touches - the &apos;sun gun&apos;, the use of seeds and knots and chains soaked in liquid silver, the idea of the vampire blood itself as a viral infectious agent - are fun to play with. The plot also throws in Jason Lee as a half-vampire priest who is trying to rid the earth of all vampires, especially Drac. Lee is a great ham, and his presence in the movie is a good excuse to do be-headings and fisticuffs and glares filled with Jesuitical outrage, etc.

But in the end, the whole thing falls short. I really don&apos;t have a problem with the cast, but no one here has half the acting firepower of Christopher Lee OR Christopher Plummer. (Of course, that&apos;s true of most movies!) The guy who plays the revived version of Dracula seems to have a bit more charisma this time around than Butler&apos;s D2K version, (or maybe it is just that the plot has him acting in ways that are a bit less cliché than the normal run of vampire movies.) but it&apos;s still an pretty subdued performance. The movie suffers a bit from lack of internal consistency and cohesion about how the whole vampire infection things is supposed to work. And all but two of the group members turn out to be hateful creeps (except for a member who gets killed early on), which murks up the &apos;good versus evil&apos; theme common to most horror movies. 

But there is ONE great moment moment near the end of the film where Dracula finally escapes his bonds and confining measures with contemptuous ease and bites the face off one of his captors (&quot;Go ahead - I&apos;ll still live forever!&quot; &quot;But will you *WANT* to?!?&quot; C-H-O-M-P!!!) that reinforces the fact that messing with the Prince Of Darkness under ANY circumstances is like trying to catch lightning in a bottle. 

So in the end, is this movie worth watching? Yes, in fact, I prefer it to D2K for the sheer novelty of the plot. Is it a great movie? No, because there is no actor here who does more than a competent job, and the screenplay doesn&apos;t live up to the promise of the premise.

Dracula II:Ascension

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNDRmNTgxZjAtZjA2MC00OTlkLWJlZTUtZGNmNDE5MjdlNTk3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzU1NzE3NTg@._V1_.jpg

This is a sequel of sorts to "Dracula 2000", and the opening moments will be somewhat confusing to those who haven't seen that movie first. D2K had one original idea going for it (Dracula was actually Judas Iscariot, consumed by his own guilt in his betrayal of Jesus, and who hanged himself), and in the end of D2K, Dracula is both hung from a giant cross AND burned by the rising sun, the combination of which is supposed to be enough finally put the King Of Vampires to rest once and for all.

So D2:Ascension opens up with a paramedic team pulling the fried remains of Dracula in from his hanging gibbet. Apparently the heroes of D2K couldn't be bothered to actually either a) finally dispose of his body or b) explain to the authorities that the 'corpse' might still be dangerous, which strikes me as REMARKABLY irresponsible of them. But anyway, the cleanup crew who pulls in the body only sees Dracula's remains as those of another anonymous John Doe, and ship the remains off to the nearest morgue. By an INCREDIBLE coincidence, the young lady in charge happens to be part of a group of medical students (and a professor) who are on the lookout for vampire remains. She becomes suspicious that these remains might be those of an actual vampire, and the group carts the remains off to a lonely mansion to soak Drac's corpse in a bathtub full of blood (don't worry, it's plasma from the hospital). Drac revives, and hijinks and hilarity ensue. 

I give the creators credit for adding a few interesting twists and details to the standard vampire tale. The idea of a group of researchers trying to hold a creature as insanely powerful and dangerous as the King Of Vampires while they try to isolate the factors that grant him power and immortality is potentially quite good. The group dynamics are also interesting, with internal dissension and betrayals tearing the group apart almost from the beginning. And some of the little touches - the 'sun gun', the use of seeds and knots and chains soaked in liquid silver, the idea of the vampire blood itself as a viral infectious agent - are fun to play with. The plot also throws in Jason Lee as a half-vampire priest who is trying to rid the earth of all vampires, especially Drac. Lee is a great ham, and his presence in the movie is a good excuse to do be-headings and fisticuffs and glares filled with Jesuitical outrage, etc.

But in the end, the whole thing falls short. I really don't have a problem with the cast, but no one here has half the acting firepower of Christopher Lee OR Christopher Plummer. (Of course, that's true of most movies!) The guy who plays the revived version of Dracula seems to have a bit more charisma this time around than Butler's D2K version, (or maybe it is just that the plot has him acting in ways that are a bit less cliché than the normal run of vampire movies.) but it's still an pretty subdued performance. The movie suffers a bit from lack of internal consistency and cohesion about how the whole vampire infection things is supposed to work. And all but two of the group members turn out to be hateful creeps (except for a member who gets killed early on), which murks up the 'good versus evil' theme common to most horror movies. 

But there is ONE great moment moment near the end of the film where Dracula finally escapes his bonds and confining measures with contemptuous ease and bites the face off one of his captors ("Go ahead - I'll still live forever!" "But will you *WANT* to?!?" C-H-O-M-P!!!) that reinforces the fact that messing with the Prince Of Darkness under ANY circumstances is like trying to catch lightning in a bottle. 

So in the end, is this movie worth watching? Yes, in fact, I prefer it to D2K for the sheer novelty of the plot. Is it a great movie? No, because there is no actor here who does more than a competent job, and the screenplay doesn't live up to the promise of the premise.

In this haunting sequel to Wes Craven's Dracula 2000, a group of medical students discover the body of the infamous count.

bappamtv

Dracula II: Ascension

🎭 Top Cast

🎬 Technical Specs

🏷️ Keywords

🎯 Categories

⭐ Featured Review

💡 Did You Know?

🎬 More Like This

📖 Synopsis