Don Henderson, Diane Keen, Peter Sallis, and Don Warrington in Crown Court (1972)

John Barron

Jan Harvey

Bernard Gallagher

Lionel Goldstein

Constable Copesley reinforces Bell&apos;s claims that Knight resisted arrest, he asserts that he witnessed Knight firmly resisting arrest. Rosemary Davenport disputes Copesley&apos;s evidence, querying how he could have seen what he claims.

Stephen Butcher

Freedom to Incite: Part 3

A thought provoking conclusion.

Constable Bell&apos;s colleague, Constable Copesley, details how Knight was resisting arrest and that Bell had no choice but to restrain him. Rosemary Davenport picks holes in Copesley&apos;s story, questioning how he could have seen what he claimed amidst a riot.

It has been a really fine case; it&apos;s fair to say I&apos;ve become a little hooked on this series. It is so watchable, and they always manage to hit the nail on the head. This was topical and thought-provoking.

Both the defending and prosecuting counsels spend a long time putting their cases forward, mainly from an emotional standpoint, and both speak passionately.

As much as I adore John Barron, he&apos;s a little subdued here, I&apos;d argue it&apos;s Jan Harvey who stands out here. Remember, she&apos;d go on to do Howard&apos;s Way some years later, a show in which you could argue she was wasted.

John Forgeham is one of those actors whose face I know, but I can&apos;t quite remember from where. His passionate outburst was quite a moment, a reminder of the impossible job the police do.

Do you think the jury got it right?

Great episode!

9/10.

Constable Bell's colleague, Constable Copesley, details how Knight was resisting arrest and that Bell had no choice but to restrain him. Rosemary Davenport picks holes in Copesley's story, questioning how he could have seen what he claimed amidst a riot.

It has been a really fine case; it's fair to say I've become a little hooked on this series. It is so watchable, and they always manage to hit the nail on the head. This was topical and thought-provoking.

Both the defending and prosecuting counsels spend a long time putting their cases forward, mainly from an emotional standpoint, and both speak passionately.

As much as I adore John Barron, he's a little subdued here, I'd argue it's Jan Harvey who stands out here. Remember, she'd go on to do Howard's Way some years later, a show in which you could argue she was wasted.

John Forgeham is one of those actors whose face I know, but I can't quite remember from where. His passionate outburst was quite a moment, a reminder of the impossible job the police do.

Do you think the jury got it right?

Great episode!

9/10.

Constable Copesley reinforces Bell's claims that Knight resisted arrest, he asserts that he witnessed Knight firmly resisting arrest. Rosemary Davenport disputes Copesley's evidence, querying how he could have seen what he claims.

bappamtv

Freedom to Incite: Part 3

🎭 Top Cast

🎬 Technical Specs

🎯 Categories

⭐ Featured Review

📖 Synopsis